Orthodoxy Through the 19th Century

[RG #70] Orthodoxy Through the 19th Century

September 1997 - February 1998 

Organizer:

Yosef Salmon (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)

During the nineteenth century, Ashkenazi Jewish society in Europe underwent a radical transformation. Until this point, the Jews had constituted a religious-national minority, divided into local communities with more or less homogenous social and religious institutions. Now, large sectors of the Jewish public reorganized themselves into new social frameworks and divided into religious streams. The beginnings of this process can be seen already in the second half of the eighteenth century with the rise of Hasidism, but it was only during the next hundred years that the trend became more institutionalized and variegated. The main currents that crystallized included Reform, Orthodox and Conservative Judaism. Each current encompassed sub-groups which resulted from the various social and historical contexts in which these streams developed. The process included internal splits and competition as well as independent developments within each movement. Beginning in Germany at the start of the nineteenth century, the phenomenon spread to Bohemia, Hungary, England and the United States, reaching Eastern Europe toward the end of the century.

Whereas the Reform and Conservative movements have basked in the historiographical limelight for decades, Orthodoxy has received serious attention as a subject worthy of historical research only during the last twenty years. The late Prof. Jacob Katz defined the phenomenon and encouraged his students to investigate it. In his opinion, Jewish Orthodoxy emerged at the end of the eighteenth century as a response to the challenges of modernity in general, and to the other Jewish religious currents in particular. The strengthening of Orthodoxy in recent years has stimulated research into its historical roots.

Over the years, Orthodoxy itself evolved and became more diversified in its responses to the challenges presented by other Jewish religious trends (Reform and Positive-Historical Judaism in Germany, Neologism in Hungary) and Jewish social movements, especially in Eastern Europe (Zionism and Jewish Socialism). Zionism added a new aspect to the problem of modernity: the question of how to relate to Zionist activity in the Land of Israel and specifically whether to cooperate with “errant” Jews in this regard. In addition, Zionism invested messianic aspirations with new meaning. At the same time, Orthodoxy was essentially a reaction to the secularization of Jewish society, a subject which has not yet been sufficiently analysed and evaluated in historical research.

 

Members

men

David Ellenson

FELLOW
Hebrew Union College, Los Angeles
David is a professor in the Jewish Institute of Religion at Hebrew Union College, Los Angeles.
men

Michael A. Meyer

FELLOW
Hebrew Union College, Cincinnati
Michael is a professor in the Jewish Institute of Religion at Hebrew Union College, Cincinnati.
men

Aviezer Ravitzky

FELLOW
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Aviezer is a professor in the Department of Jewish Thought at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
men

Yosef Salmon

FELLOW
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Yosef is a professor in the Department of History at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
men

Michael Kalman Silber

FELLOW
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Michael is a professor in the Department of History of the Jewish People at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.